Section 40(a)(ia) Income Tax Act: 30% Disallowance for TDS Non-Compliance - Complete Guide FY 2026-27
Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is one of the most critical provisions that disallows 30% of business expenses when Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is not deducted or not deposited by the specified due date. This provision acts as a compliance enforcement mechanism ensuring timely TDS deduction and payment. For businesses, understanding Section 40(a)(ia) is essential because non-compliance can result in significant disallowance of legitimate expenses, increasing tax liability substantially. This comprehensive guide covers all aspects of Section 40(a)(ia) for FY 2026-27, including legislative history, current provisions, relief mechanisms, practical examples, and important judicial precedents.
What is Section 40(a)(ia)?
Section 40(a)(ia) was introduced by the Finance Act, 2004 with effect from 1st April 2005 (Assessment Year 2005-06). It is a disallowance provision that restricts the deduction of certain business expenses when TDS obligations are not fulfilled properly.
Legislative Intent: The provision was introduced to ensure better TDS compliance by creating a direct financial consequence for non-deduction or non-payment of TDS. It acts as both a deterrent and enforcement mechanism to improve tax collection at source.
Scope of Application
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Applicable To | All assessees (individuals, HUF, firms, companies, etc.) - irrespective of status |
| Head of Income | Only for "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" |
| Type of Payments | Any sum payable to a resident on which TDS is deductible under Chapter XVII-B |
| Non-Residents | NOT covered under Section 40(a)(ia) - covered under Section 40(a)(i) |
| Allowability Under | Expenses otherwise allowable under Sections 30 to 38 of the Act |
Legislative Evolution of Section 40(a)(ia)
Section 40(a)(ia) has undergone several amendments since its introduction. Understanding this evolution is crucial for proper compliance.
📅 Timeline of Major Amendments
AY 2005-06 (Finance Act 2004):
- Introduction: Section 40(a)(ia) introduced
- Coverage: Limited to interest, commission, brokerage, professional fees, technical fees, and contractor payments
- Disallowance: 100% disallowance of amount
- TDS Payment Deadline: Before expiry of time under Section 200(1)
AY 2006-07 (Taxation Laws Amendment Act 2006):
- Addition: Rent and Royalty added to covered payments
AY 2008-09 (Finance Act 2008 - Retrospective from AY 2005-06):
- Liberalization: TDS payment deadline extended to due date of filing return u/s 139(1)
- Impact: Gave more time to deductors to pay TDS
AY 2010-11 (Finance Act 2010 - Prospective):
- Simplification: Single deadline - TDS payment required on or before due date u/s 139(1)
- Clarity: Removed complex month-wise analysis
AY 2013-14 (Finance Act 2012):
- Second Proviso Added: Relief where payee has filed return and paid taxes (Form 26A mechanism)
- Breakthrough: Saved genuine cases from disallowance
AY 2015-16 (Finance Act 2014) - MAJOR CHANGE:
- Disallowance Reduced: From 100% to 30% only
- Expansion: Extended to ALL payments to residents under Chapter XVII-B (not just specified payments)
- Relief: Significant reduction in hardship for businesses
Current Provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) for FY 2026-27
As applicable for Assessment Year 2027-28 (Financial Year 2026-27), the current text of Section 40(a)(ia) reads:
"Thirty per cent of any sum payable to a resident,
on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B
and such tax has not been deducted or,
after deduction, has not been paid
on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139"
Key Components Explained
- "Thirty per cent":
- Only 30% of the expense is disallowed (from AY 2015-16 onwards)
- Remaining 70% is allowed as deduction
- Earlier it was 100% disallowance (till AY 2014-15)
- "Any sum payable to a resident":
- Covers ALL types of payments to residents
- Not limited to specific categories anymore
- Includes payments under all TDS sections (192, 194C, 194J, 194I, etc.)
- "Tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B":
- TDS must be legally required to be deducted
- If no TDS liability exists, Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply
- Exemptions like Form 15G/15H, threshold limits, etc. are relevant
- "Has not been deducted":
- First limb - TDS not deducted at all
- Also includes short deduction (deducted at wrong rate)
- "After deduction, has not been paid":
- Second limb - TDS deducted but not deposited with government
- Late payment attracts disallowance
- "Due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139":
- For companies: 31st October of assessment year
- For others requiring audit: 31st October of assessment year
- For others: 31st July of assessment year
- Specific dates for FY 2026-27 covered in Return Due Dates guide
When Does Section 40(a)(ia) Apply?
For Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance to be triggered, the following conditions must be satisfied:
Mandatory Conditions for Disallowance
| Condition | Requirement | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Expense | Expense must be under "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" | Capital gains, salary, house property income expenses NOT covered |
| 2. Allowable Under Sections 30-38 | Expense must be otherwise allowable under Sections 30 to 38 | Expenses allowable under Section 28 or other sections not covered |
| 3. Payment to Resident | Payee must be an Indian resident | Non-resident payments covered under Section 40(a)(i) |
| 4. TDS Requirement Exists | Payment must attract TDS under Chapter XVII-B | If no TDS liability, Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply |
| 5. TDS Not Deducted OR Not Paid | Either TDS not deducted or deducted but not deposited by due date | Both scenarios attract 30% disallowance |
Situations Where Section 40(a)(ia) Does NOT Apply
Safe Harbor Situations:
- No TDS Liability: When payment amount is below threshold limit (e.g., rent below ₹2,40,000 per annum)
- Form 15G/15H Filed: When payee has no tax liability and files declaration (covered under second proviso)
- Lower/Nil Deduction Certificate: When valid certificate u/s 197 obtained from payee
- Payment to Non-Resident: Covered under Section 40(a)(i), not 40(a)(ia)
- Capital Expenses: Generally not covered (depreciation not an "expense" but statutory allowance)
- Presumptive Taxation: Sections 44AD, 44ADA, 44AE - not applicable
- Payee Filed Return & Paid Tax: Relief under second proviso (Form 26A)
Proviso 1: Subsequent Year Deduction
The first proviso provides relief for subsequent rectification of TDS default.
First Proviso Text:
"Provided that where in respect of any such sum, tax has been deducted in any subsequent year, or has been deducted during the previous year but paid after the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139, thirty per cent of such sum shall be allowed as a deduction in computing the income of the previous year in which such tax has been paid."
How First Proviso Works
Example - Subsequent Year Deduction:
FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27):
- Professional fees paid: ₹10,00,000
- TDS @10% (Section 194J): ₹1,00,000
- TDS NOT deducted or paid during FY 2025-26
- ITR filing due date: 31st October 2026
Tax Impact FY 2025-26:
- Expense claimed: ₹10,00,000
- Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia): ₹3,00,000 (30% of ₹10,00,000)
- Allowed deduction: ₹7,00,000
FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28):
- Assessee deducts and pays ₹1,00,000 TDS in December 2026
- Can claim deduction of ₹3,00,000 in FY 2026-27
- Relief obtained in subsequent year
Net Effect: Disallowance temporary, but causes cash flow issues and advance tax complications
Proviso 2: Form 26A Relief (Game Changer)
The second proviso, introduced by Finance Act 2012 (effective AY 2013-14), provides significant relief where the payee has fulfilled tax obligations even though the payer failed to deduct TDS.
Second Proviso Text:
"Provided further that where an assessee fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B on any such sum but is not deemed to be an assessee in default under the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 201, then, for the purpose of this sub-clause, it shall be deemed that the assessee has deducted and paid the tax on such sum on the date of furnishing of return of income by the resident payee referred to in the said proviso."
Connection with Section 201(1) - First Proviso
The second proviso is linked with Section 201(1) first proviso, which states:
Section 201(1) First Proviso Conditions:
- Payee has filed return of income u/s 139
- Payee has included the payment in return and computed income accordingly
- Payee has paid tax due on income declared
- Payer furnishes certificate from Chartered Accountant in Form 26A
If all four conditions are met, the payer is not deemed assessee-in-default and consequently, Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance doesn't apply.
Form 26A - Certificate Format
| Particular | Details |
|---|---|
| Form Name | Form 26A - Certificate u/s 203 of Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| Issued By | Chartered Accountant (in practice) |
| Certifies | That payee has filed return, included income, and paid taxes |
| Required For | Payer to avoid being treated as assessee-in-default |
| Impact | Saves 30% disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) |
Practical Example - Form 26A Relief
Scenario:
XYZ Ltd (Payer):
- Paid professional fees of ₹15,00,000 to Mr. Sharma (Payee)
- Forgot to deduct TDS @10% = ₹1,50,000
- Realized mistake after filing ITR
Without Form 26A:
- Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia): 30% of ₹15,00,000 = ₹4,50,000
- Additional tax for XYZ Ltd @25.168%: ₹1,13,256
- Plus interest u/s 234B/234C
With Form 26A Relief:
Mr. Sharma (Payee) Actions:
- Files ITR including ₹15,00,000 as professional income
- Computes tax liability and pays ₹1,50,000+ tax
- Obtains CA certificate in Form 26A
- Provides Form 26A to XYZ Ltd
XYZ Ltd (Payer) Actions:
- Receives Form 26A from Mr. Sharma
- Submits Form 26A during assessment proceedings
- Result: NO disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia)
- Tax Saved: ₹1,13,256 + interest
Note: Form 26A doesn't eliminate payer's liability u/s 201(1A) interest, but saves disallowance
Calculation of Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia)
Basic Formula
Scenarios with Calculations
Scenario 1: Complete Non-Deduction
Facts:
- Contractor payment (Section 194C): ₹25,00,000
- TDS @1% = ₹25,000
- TDS NOT deducted at all
- ITR filed on time
Calculation:
- Expense claimed: ₹25,00,000
- Disallowance: ₹25,00,000 × 30% = ₹7,50,000
- Allowed deduction: ₹25,00,000 - ₹7,50,000 = ₹17,50,000
Scenario 2: Late Payment of TDS
Facts (FY 2026-27):
- Professional fees (Section 194J): ₹8,00,000
- TDS @10% deducted: ₹80,000
- TDS deducted on 31st March 2027
- Due date for non-audit case: 31st July 2027
- TDS actually paid: 15th August 2027 (late payment)
Calculation:
- Expense claimed: ₹8,00,000
- Disallowance: ₹8,00,000 × 30% = ₹2,40,000
- Allowed deduction in FY 2026-27: ₹5,60,000
- Eligible for deduction in FY 2027-28: ₹2,40,000 (when TDS paid)
Scenario 3: Short Deduction of TDS
Facts:
- Rent payment (Section 194I): ₹12,00,000
- Correct TDS @10%: ₹1,20,000
- Actual TDS deducted @2% (wrong rate): ₹24,000
- Short deduction: ₹96,000
Controversy on Calculation:
View 1 (Revenue): 30% of Entire Amount
- Since "such tax" not deducted properly, entire amount covered
- Disallowance: ₹12,00,000 × 30% = ₹3,60,000
View 2 (Taxpayer): 30% of Proportionate Amount
- Only proportionate amount on which TDS short deducted
- Short deduction: ₹96,000 (8% not deducted)
- Proportionate payment: ₹12,00,000 × (96,000/120,000) = ₹9,60,000
- Disallowance: ₹9,60,000 × 30% = ₹2,88,000
Judicial Support: Most tribunals support proportionate disallowance approach
Paid vs. Payable Controversy
One of the most litigated issues under Section 40(a)(ia) is whether it applies only to "payable" amounts (outstanding at year-end) or also to "paid" amounts during the year.
Controversy Background
The section uses the term "any sum payable to a resident" - Does this mean:
- Only amounts outstanding (payable) at year-end? OR
- Both paid during year + payable at year-end?
Judicial Decisions
| Court/Tribunal | Case Name | View |
|---|---|---|
| Visakhapatnam Special Bench ITAT | Merilyn Shipping & Transport (2012) | TAXPAYER FAVORABLE: Applies only to "payable" (outstanding) amounts, NOT to amounts actually paid during year |
| Kolkata ITAT | DCIT vs. Ashika Stock Broking (2013) | REVENUE FAVORABLE: Applies to both paid and payable amounts |
| Hyderabad ITAT | Teja Construction (2011) | TAXPAYER FAVORABLE: Only payable amounts covered |
| Andhra Pradesh HC | CIT vs. Merilyn Shipping (2012) | Granted interim stay on Special Bench order (matter sub-judice) |
Current Position (FY 2026-27):
- No Final Clarity: Matter still not settled conclusively by Supreme Court
- Majority View: Most tribunals follow Special Bench view that only "payable" amounts covered
- Practical Advice: Be prepared for litigation if taking favorable view; deduct TDS on all payments to be safe
- Assessment Risk: Assessing Officers may take both views depending on jurisdiction
Applicability to Different Types of Expenses
Capital Expenditure and Depreciation
General Rule: Section 40(a)(ia) applies to expenses allowable under Sections 30 to 38 while computing "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession"
Capital Expenses:
- Research & Development (Section 35): If allowable as deduction (weighted/100%), Section 40(a)(ia) applies
- Depreciation (Section 32): NOT an "expenditure" but statutory allowance - Section 40(a)(ia) generally doesn't apply
- Actual Cost/WDV: Defined in Section 43, not overridden by Section 40(a)(ia)
Case Law: Ahmedabad Special Bench ITAT in Shri Vishnu Anant Mahajan (2012) held depreciation is statutory deduction, not expenditure - Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply
Presumptive Taxation Schemes
Section 40(a)(ia) does NOT apply to income computed under presumptive taxation schemes:
- Section 44AD: Presumptive taxation for small businesses (8%/6% of turnover)
- Section 44ADA: Presumptive taxation for professionals (50% of receipts)
- Section 44AE: Goods carriage business (fixed amount per vehicle)
- Section 44BB, 44BBB, etc.: Special presumptive provisions
Reason: These sections have non-obstante clause overriding Sections 28 to 43C; no expense-wise computation required
Other Heads of Income
| Head of Income | Section 40(a)(ia) Applicable? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Salary Income | NO | Section 40 applies only to "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" |
| House Property | NO | Covered under Section 22-27, not Sections 30-38 |
| Capital Gains | NO | Brokerage on sale of property not business expense (case: Mrs. Sushila Mallick) |
| Other Sources | NO | Not business income |
| Charitable Trusts (Section 11) | NO | Exemption computed under Section 11, not Section 28 (case: Mahatma Gandhi Seva Mandir) |
TDS Under Wrong Section
A common practical issue is when TDS is deducted but under the wrong section of Chapter XVII-B. Does this attract Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance?
Case Law Position
Taxpayer Favorable View:
Delhi ITAT in ITO vs. Premier Medical Supplies (2012):
- Section 40(a)(ia) has two limbs: (1) deduct tax, (2) pay tax after deduction
- If TDS deducted (even under wrong section) and paid, both limbs satisfied
- Shortfall or wrong section is matter for Section 201 (assessee-in-default), not Section 40(a)(ia)
- Held: No disallowance when TDS deducted under wrong section
Kolkata ITAT in Dy. CIT vs. S.K. Tekriwal (2011):
- Similar view - wrong section TDS doesn't attract disallowance
- Confirmed by Calcutta HC (2012)
Mumbai ITAT in DCIT vs. Chandabhoy & Jassobhoy (2011):
- Supported same principle
Counter View (Some Tribunals):
- Section uses term "such tax" - means tax required to be deducted under applicable section
- If wrong section used, "such tax" not deducted
- Second proviso (Finance Act 2012) mentions "whole or any part of tax" - indicates even partial default attracts provision
Practical Advice: While judicial support exists for taxpayer view, always deduct TDS under correct section to avoid litigation
No TDS Liability Situations
Section 40(a)(ia) applies only when there is a legal liability to deduct TDS. If no TDS liability exists, the provision doesn't apply.
Common No-TDS-Liability Scenarios
Scenario 1: Below Threshold Limit
- Case: Cuttack ITAT in Pareek Electricals (2014)
- Facts: Rent paid to lady below taxable limit; Form 15G provided
- Held: No TDS liability, hence Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply
- Principle: If payment below threshold, no disallowance even without TDS
Scenario 2: Form 15G/15H Cases
- Case: Jaipur ITAT in Shyam Sunder Kailash Chand (2012)
- Facts: Form 15G received few days late but before assessment
- Held: No disallowance since Form 15G eliminates TDS liability
- But: Delhi ITAT in ACIT vs. Meerut Rubber Factory (2014) held Form 15G must be received by year-end
Scenario 3: Section 194C(3) Proviso - Two Vehicle Exemption
- Case: Gujarat HC in CIT vs. Valibhai Khanbhai Mankad (2012)
- Facts: Payments to sub-contractors owning max 2 vehicles; declarations received
- Held: Once Section 194C(3) conditions satisfied, TDS liability ceases; Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply
- Important: Later requirement to furnish details (Rule 29D) doesn't revive TDS liability
Important Court Judgments - Summary
Constitutional Validity
Challenge: Double jeopardy - penalty/prosecution already exist for TDS default
Upheld By:
- Punjab & Haryana HC in Rakesh Kumar & Co. (2007)
- Madras HC in Tube Investment of India (2008)
- Allahabad HC in Dey's Medical (2009)
Conclusion: Section 40(a)(ia) constitutionally valid
Key Precedents Table
| Issue | Case Name | Principle Established |
|---|---|---|
| Paid vs Payable | Merilyn Shipping (ITAT SB 2012) | Applies only to payable (outstanding) amounts |
| Wrong Section TDS | ITO vs. Premier Medical (ITAT 2012) | No disallowance if TDS deducted (even wrong section) and paid |
| Depreciation | Vishnu Anant Mahajan (ITAT SB 2012) | Depreciation is statutory allowance, not expenditure - Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply |
| No TDS Liability | Valibhai Khanbhai Mankad (Gujarat HC 2012) | If no legal TDS liability, Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply |
| Presumptive Taxation | ITO vs. Mark Construction (ITAT 2014) | Section 44AD assesses override Section 40(a)(ia) |
| Capital Gains | Mrs. Sushila Mallick (ITAT 2012) | Brokerage on property sale not business expense - Section 40(a)(ia) doesn't apply |
| Charitable Trusts | Mahatma Gandhi Seva Mandir (ITAT 2013) | Section 40(a) applies to Section 28, not Section 11 income |
Practical Compliance Tips for FY 2026-27
- Timely TDS Deduction:
- Deduct TDS at the time of payment or credit, whichever is earlier
- Maintain TDS register with deduction dates
- Use correct TDS sections and rates (refer TDS Guide)
- Payment Before Due Date:
- Pay TDS on or before 31st July 2027 (non-audit) or 31st October 2027 (audit cases)
- Don't wait till last day - pay monthly by 7th of next month
- Track payment dates and obtain challans
- Form 26A Strategy:
- If TDS missed, immediately communicate with payee
- Ensure payee includes income in return and pays taxes
- Obtain CA certificate in Form 26A before assessment proceedings
- Keep Form 26A ready during audits
- TDS Certificates and Returns:
- Lower/Nil Deduction Certificates:
- If payee has lower/nil tax liability, advise them to apply for certificate u/s 197
- Maintain valid certificates on record
- Documentation:
- Maintain vendor master with PAN details
- Keep Form 15G/15H declarations (where applicable)
- Document threshold limit exemptions
- Tax Audit Reporting:
- Clause 30(c) of Form 3CD requires reporting of Section 40(a)(ia) disallowances
- Coordinate with tax auditor for proper reporting
- Advance Tax Planning:
- If disallowance expected, factor in advance tax computation
- Pay advance tax to avoid interest u/s 234B/234C
📚 Related TDS and Compliance Topics
- Complete TDS Guide for India
- Section 201(1A) - Interest on Late TDS Payment
- Section 194C - TDS on Contractor Payments
- Section 194J - TDS on Professional Fees
- Section 194I - TDS on Rent
- Section 197 - Lower/Nil TDS Certificate
- Form 26Q - Quarterly TDS Return
- Form 16A - TDS Certificate
- Business & Profession Income - Complete Guide
- Section 44AD - Presumptive Taxation
- Tax Audit Under Section 44AB
- Form 3CD - Tax Audit Report
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Key Takeaways for FY 2026-27
- Section 40(a)(ia) disallows 30% of business expenses when TDS not deducted or not paid by ITR due date
- Applies to ALL payments to residents under Chapter XVII-B (not limited to specific categories anymore)
- Does NOT apply to non-residents (covered under Section 40(a)(i) with 100% disallowance)
- TDS must be paid by 31st July 2027 or 31st October 2027 (depending on audit requirement) to avoid disallowance
- Form 26A relief is available if payee has filed return and paid taxes - can save entire 30% disallowance
- First proviso allows deduction in subsequent year when TDS is paid
- "Paid vs Payable" issue remains controversial - Special Bench favors taxpayers (only payable amounts)
- Wrong section TDS: Favorable judgments exist that no disallowance if TDS deducted and paid
- Does NOT apply to presumptive taxation schemes (44AD, 44ADA, 44AE)
- Depreciation generally not affected as it's statutory allowance, not expenditure
- Applies only to "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" head, not other income heads
- No TDS liability = No disallowance (threshold limits, Form 15G/15H cases, etc.)
Conclusion
Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is a crucial compliance provision that every business must understand and follow diligently. The reduction of disallowance from 100% to 30% (from AY 2015-16) and the introduction of Form 26A relief mechanism (from AY 2013-14) have significantly reduced the hardship on taxpayers, but the provision still demands strict adherence to TDS rules.
For FY 2026-27, businesses must ensure timely TDS deduction and payment by the due date u/s 139(1) to avoid 30% disallowance. The key is proactive TDS management - maintaining proper systems, documenting exemptions, issuing certificates, filing returns on time, and keeping Form 26A as a backup option for genuine cases where TDS was missed.
Several judicial precedents provide relief in specific situations - whether it's the "paid vs payable" issue, wrong section TDS, or no TDS liability cases. However, relying on litigation should be the last resort. The safest approach is full TDS compliance from the start.
The Form 26A mechanism under the second proviso is particularly useful for genuine hardship cases where the payer forgot to deduct TDS but the payee has already paid taxes. This provision reflects the legislature's intent to provide relief where revenue has not been lost to the government, though procedural compliance was missed.
As we move forward in FY 2026-27, businesses should integrate TDS compliance into their payment systems, conduct periodic reviews, coordinate with vendors for Form 15G/15H or Section 197 certificates where applicable, and maintain robust documentation. Proper tax audit reporting in Form 3CD and timely response to assessment notices are equally important.
Remember, Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance is just one consequence of TDS non-compliance. Interest u/s 201(1A), penalties u/s 271C, and prosecution provisions create additional burdens. Therefore, investing in proper TDS compliance systems and training is not just good tax practice - it's essential business risk management.
Need Professional Help with TDS Compliance? Explore our comprehensive guides on TDS, Business Income, Tax Audit, and Income Tax Compliances for complete business tax solutions.
🚀 Popular Services
🏢 Business Registration
Start your business legally
Need Expert Help?
We're here to assist you with